Sports Betting in Alabama: Why It Remains Illegal
The Legislative Background of Sports Betting in Alabama
As of now, sports betting in Alabama is illegal, and this status is the result of a long history of restrictive state laws combined with ongoing political inertia. While many states across the country have moved toward legalized sports wagering since the Supreme Court overturned the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) in 2018, Alabama has not followed that trend. Instead, the state continues to enforce some of the strictest gambling regulations in the nation. Alabama’s constitution has long imposed limitations on almost every form of gambling, allowing only narrowly defined exceptions. These exceptions include charitable bingo in certain counties, pari-mutuel wagering at a few racetracks, and limited forms of gaming at tribal casinos owned by the Poarch Band of Creek Indians. None of these exceptions, however, provide a legal path for sports wagering. In short, sports betting in Alabama has no existing legislative framework to support its authorization, and any attempt to legalize it would require major constitutional changes.
Why Lawmakers Have Not Approved Sports Betting in Alabama
One of the biggest obstacles to sports betting in Alabama is the difficulty of amending the state constitution. Because the constitution explicitly prohibits most types of gambling, any expansion—including sports wagering—cannot be approved through simple legislation alone. It must pass both chambers of the Alabama Legislature with a three-fifths majority and then be placed on the ballot for voters to approve statewide. This multi-step process demands broad political consensus, something Alabama lawmakers have struggled to achieve. Political divisions, disagreements about regulatory authority, and differing opinions on how tax revenue should be used have repeatedly stalled progress. Moreover, Alabama traditionally leans conservative on social issues, and this includes gambling. Some legislators view expanded gambling as morally questionable, while others oppose it due to concerns about addiction, crime, or socioeconomic impacts. These concerns have contributed to the legislative gridlock that continues to block sports betting in Alabama.
The Role of Tribal Gaming
Another important factor in the ongoing debate over sports betting in Alabama is the role of tribal casinos. The Poarch Band of Creek Indians is the only federally recognized tribe in the state and currently operates three casinos. However, these facilities are limited to Class II gaming—electronic bingo-style games—because the state has not approved Class III gaming, which includes table games and traditional slots. Tribal casinos have expressed interest in expanding their operations, but negotiations between the tribe and state officials have historically stalled. Some proposals have attempted to combine sports betting in Alabama with broader agreements to expand tribal gaming or introduce commercial casinos. Yet these efforts often become entangled in political disagreements, with various stakeholders competing over potential revenue streams and regulatory authority. As a result, sports betting becomes part of a much larger debate, delaying progress even further.
Missed Economic Opportunities
While sports betting in Alabama remains prohibited, neighboring states have begun to capitalize on legalized wagering. Tennessee, for example, launched a fully online sports betting industry in 2020 and has since generated hundreds of millions of dollars in handle each month. Mississippi allows sports betting at its commercial casinos, drawing visitors from Alabama who cross state lines to place bets. These neighboring markets provide a glimpse into the revenue Alabama could generate. Legal sports betting could produce substantial tax revenue, create new jobs, and reduce the flow of gambling dollars into surrounding states. Yet despite these economic incentives, lawmakers have yet to reach consensus on how to implement such a system. Without a unified plan, the state continues to forgo significant financial and competitive advantages.
Public Opinion and Growing Pressure
Though sports betting in Alabama is still illegal, public opinion has slowly shifted. As national exposure to legal sports wagering increases—through sports broadcasts, advertising, and widespread mobile apps—many Alabamians have become more aware of the industry and its potential benefits. Surveys conducted in recent years indicate growing support for a state lottery and expanded gambling options, including sports wagering. This shift has begun to influence political conversations, with some legislators acknowledging that voters may be more receptive to regulated gambling than in the past. However, public support alone does not guarantee legislative action. Alabama’s political process requires lawmakers to craft a proposal capable of satisfying numerous interest groups, and previous attempts have failed because the proposed frameworks were either too broad, too narrow, or too politically divisive.
The Future of Sports Betting in Alabama
Moving forward, several conditions would need to align for sports betting in Alabama to become legal. First, lawmakers must introduce a comprehensive gambling proposal that can garner enough bipartisan backing to pass both the House and Senate. Second, any such proposal must include clear regulatory guidelines, tax structures, and provisions for oversight. Third, the measure must resonate with voters who ultimately decide the issue. While these hurdles are significant, they are not insurmountable. Many states with historically strict gambling laws have eventually adapted to the evolving national landscape. Alabama may follow this trend, but progress will likely remain slow until political will and public opinion converge strongly enough to drive action. For now, sports betting in Alabama remains at a legislative standstill, restricted by constitutional barriers and unresolved political disagreements. Whether the state will ultimately embrace legal sports wagering remains uncertain, but the ongoing debates suggest the issue will continue to resurface as neighboring markets grow and public support increases.
About the Author
